Revisiting Dr. King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail

Daniel Rarela designed a series of memes to stop the late civil rights leader from getting whitewashed this year. Rather than comment on Dr. King’s legacy, which is rich and well known to us all, I’d rather post the way an artist of incredible talent celebrated his life with a series of memes designed to illustrate the real Dr. King. Too often, and this happens with famous people all the time (Think George Washington and the Parson Weem’s stories.), get turned into comfortable role models. All the blood, sweat, and tears of their lives are sucked out of the public’s collective memory and replaced by sugar-coated morality tales, if not designed to are guaranteed to put most anyone to sleep.

I remember Dr. King. I remember the terrible battles of the civil rights era. I remember the assassinations of those years. The mythology of the swingin’ sixties tells us that it was all peace, love beads, free love, Woodstock, and LSD. It wasn’t. The sixties were some of the most traumatic years in our history. And, like the mythology of the sixties paints a pleasantly psychedelic picture of those years, so too, does the mythology surrounding the civil rights movement. Rosa Parks has been reduced to a “tired seamstress” and Dr. King’s message of non-violence turned into smarmy passivity. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Follow the link below and prepare to be overwhelmed.

https://mic.com/articles/165598/artist-creates-letters-from-birmingham-jail-memes-to-stop-people-from-whitewashing-mlk#.EskYbmtFj

 

“Too many rights!”

Today’s news feed brought yet another story about our bigot-in-chief’s ardent supporters. They have apparently lost all sense of decency as they find new and more ornate ways to support his never-ending lying, his crude behavior, the tax scam he implemented, and his other and varied criminal activities. You can read the full story at this link: https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-toxic-loyalty-of-trumps-hardcore-zealots?via=twitter_page

Over the past year and a half all of the articles trying to explain their lunatic and cult-like behavior indicate that at the heart of their support and the stated source of the justification for their anger is the feeling that they are losing something they didn’t even realize they had — their white privilege. By that I mean that sense of themselves as being on a higher plane that minorities, no matter how low their own situation might be. For example, when christian churches dominated American life, it boosted the self-worth of white evangelicals and helped define their place in their world. Poor white evangelically-affiliated christians may have nothing, but they were secure knowing that gay people, people of color, urban intellectuals, etc. knew their place and dared not challenge them for an equal share of the American Dream.

On this day:  January 2, 1965: The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee with the help of Martin Luther King Jr. announced the beginning of a new campaign to help register African-American voters in Selma, Alabama. Dallas County Sheriff Jim Clark did his best to stop that. Over the next two months, more than 2,000 people were arrested for attempting to register or encouraging others to vote

What they are suddenly noticing is that the world they created through legal oppression, Jim Crow laws, the criminalization of LGBTQ people, and other legal means, is falling apart. They have been angry since the first stirrings of the civil rights movement of the in the 1960s and have only become more and more angry since. As first one then another and another legal structure perpetuating inequality was struck down, the stark truth began to emerge. Equality for all, meant the loss of privilege for them. The response has been claims of reverse discrimination — we don’t want to share, we want it all; and cries and lamentations that suddenly minorities all have “too many rights.” In spite of the obvious gross inequalities easily observable with no more than a glance, they are screaming that they are now the ones who are being oppressed. It’s nuts, but there it is.

mlk-nyer

Well, well, Alabama surprised us all.

Doug Jones won a seat in the Senate. The first Democrat in about 25 years. What’s interesting about his win is that it was a close race. You wouldn’t have thought that on the face of the guy he was running against. Roy Moore, his opponent and standard bearer of the GOP, is a former judge, twice removed from office for refusing to follow federal guidelines. For example he refused to remove a huge stone with the ten commandments carved on it from the front of the court house. He was also a well-known racist, misogynist, and homophobe. He also had nasty words to say about immigrants of the browner ethnicities, Mexicans, and Democrats.

As though to place a cherry on top of the sundae of disgusting behavior and rhetoric from this man, it was common knowledge that he was a pedophile. So, you would think Jones would have beat him walking away. But, you’d be wrong. No, in fact the people of Alabama, or I should say, the evangelical “christians” came out in force to support the old reprobate. Weeks, I tell ya, weeks of hearing people make excuses for his inexcusable behavior was enough to make ya puke. Oh, an then he was asked a question that proved to be the defining moment of his entire public life. The question was, “In your estimation, when was America great?” The following is from Time Magazine’s coverage of the incident.

“A comment Moore made at a Florence, Ala., rally in September resurfaced  Thursday and struck a chord with many users on the social networking site, including African-American celebrities and politicians. At the rally, an African-American audience member asked Moore when America was last “great,” the Los Angeles Timesreported in September. Moore responded in a way that appeared to condone, or at least downplay the impact of, slavery, the Times reported.

“I think it was great at the time when families were united — even though we had slavery — they cared for one another…. Our families were strong, our country had a direction,” Moore said, according to the Times.”

So, how did Jones win? Black women and men found him reprehensible and voted nearly 100% for Jones. And apparently about 75% of white folks (including 45 who gave him a full-throated endorsement at his aptly located pep rally in Pensacola, Florida right over the state line from Alabama) without a shred of decency and a boatload of bigotry voted for Moore. Somebody has to tell them it’s time to leave the Jim Crow era behind.

ala election

 

Time to update

The last entry crabbed about what I felt was an unfair review of our book. After rereading it, I can still feel the sting of that careless review. But, much has happened since so it’s time to move on. It’s been quite some time since I last posted here, but I’m really excited to be a Goodreads author. Both of our books have been finding homes with social studies teachers, so it’s time for a fresh start.

Over the past several years, Mark and I have traveled to Birmingham, Morgantown, WV, Harrisburg, PA and to schools in the Rochester area to present our on-going research and conduct workshops for teachers and teachers to be. We feel strongly that the work we’ve done and included in our book is an important addition to understanding the African American experience. It may sound obvious, but African American history IS American history. In order to understand our past, we have to strive to know, as Paul Harvey used to say, “the rest of the story.”

B4J_STU_CVR

We’ve also again turned our attention to helping teachers by adapting our book as a student edition. It follows the teacher edition but addresses students directly in the narratives. When I wrote the high school level American history text for the National Migrant Education Assoc.’s PASS (Portable Assisted Study Sequence) curriculum, the text needed to reach students with all levels of learning abilities, reading levels, and learning styles. We took that to heart in our student edition so that any student using it would find it accessible.

As we continue to find new ways to share the work, we’ll make sure to pass our progress along.

At the very least, read it.

I’ve rarely been as upset, annoyed, furious, or sad as I am today. Yes, I’m as mad as a wet hen. I just read a supposed “review” of our book. From the first sentence it was clear that the reviewer had completely missed the point of our work. First he called it a book about Jackie Robinson. It’s not. Then with a sneering undertone wondered, what could we possibly add to the already crowded field of works about him. So, from the get go it was obvious that he hadn’t even carefully read the title. Our book is about what came before Jackie Robinson, ergo the title: Before Jackie. From that point on, he quibbled about everything we worked so hard to include so that teachers could use our history in their classrooms. No, it’s not the last word on the time period between the end of the Civil War and the onset of the modern day civil rights movement. It wasn’t meant to be. Wet_Hen_Royalty_Free_Clipart_Picture_110104-174579-266053

Teachers themselves do not have the time to do or read exhaustive research, locate sources, and craft teaching strategies. That was our goal; to do and read exhaustively and then synthesize the literature into a usable volume. We wanted to offer enough background information to aid their interest in bringing African American history into their classrooms, compile oodles of resources, and offer teaching suggestions. There is little to no African American history woven into the majority of social studies textbooks, although there has  been  some improvement seen over the past decade. But, it is not enough. My experience with the teacher candidates with whom I work confirms that they themselves know very little about African American history and are, therefore, as new teachers, unprepared themselves to compensate for their textbook’s omission of this important part of our past. And, it’s important to note that teachers are eager for just such a volume. At presentations to teachers locally, at state-wide conferences, and at national conferences, our most frequently heard reaction to our work is, “This is just what I need!”

As James Oliver Horton ended his tenure as president of the Organization of American Historians, he used his farewell address, “Patriot Acts: Public History in Public Service,” to talk about the responsibility historians have to “provide a critical context” for our contemporary conversations that are grounded in a firm understanding of our national past. In today’s political climate, what could be more important than taking tangible steps to expand our collective understandings about the ways and extent of African American participation in the national story. Without it, African American kids feel left out of American history and wrongly assume there probably isn’t any or it would be taught. Conversely, the rest of our students draw the same conclusion, giving them the impression that everything of consequence that’s ever been done, has been done by people like them. They have a past. African American kids often acquire an undeserved sense of irrelevance or bravado while white kids acquire an undeserved sense of  entitlement and arrogance. Neither is good for the country.

The review then goes on to quibble about whether or not teachers would have the class time to use our teaching suggestions. In this, he also misses the boat. They are suggestions — meant to get teachers started with enough possibilities included for them to pick and choose what elements they want to use, which ones they will use later, what they may modify, and what they can add to. To complain about too many options is like going into a restaurant and complaining about too many entrees to choose from. And, just for the record, throughout, we encourage further exploration of the topics we highlight. We include a wide variety of “for further reading” suggestions as well as on-line materials to explore. As to the comment that it wasn’t clear to the reviewer what grade level we were targeting, had he read more carefully, we offer suggestions with each teaching strategy on how teachers can use it at a variety of grade levels.

Here’s a handy-dandy little set of guidelines for peer review that would have helped, had it been used.

Four-Peer-Review-Rules-2

The one saving grace is that it was published in an obscure journal teachers are unlikely to read, so we’ll focus on the very good reviews we received from professional education journals instead. It is my opinion that the reviewer did a lousy job of reviewing our book and my greatest hope is that should he ever write a book himself, that someone review his work as carelessly.

 

2014 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 540 times in 2014. If it were a cable car, it would take about 9 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Teaching with Before Jackie

 mainartjackieametro

Mark working with students

It takes a certain amount of courage to use a book you’ve written with your own students. But, because one of the most important reasons Mark and I wrote this book was to reach pre-service social studies teachers, it would have been silly to neglect my own students. The results have been, so far, encouraging.
The layout of the book does two things: 1st it covers a broad range of African American history, from the end of the Civil War up to the modern Civil Rights Movement. This is a time period that James Loewen has called “the nadir” of race relations in this country. During this period the efforts to move a civil rights agenda forward were necessarily limited by the pervasive and often violent repression imposed on African Americans. All this means is that even small gestures and actions need to be appreciated for the enormous courage they required. For students, the evidence of this answers the question: why didn’t they fight back? The evidence shows that fighting back in overt ways was out of the question if you hoped to survive. So we looked closer to find the ways, within the system of Jim Crow, African Americans did struggle for every available inch of freedom. We characterize these struggles as “sacrifice bunts.” Not as impressive as a home run, but every bit as important.
The 2nd important element of the layout is the inclusion of lesson suggestions and resources that accompany each chapter. Anyone who is in the classroom on a daily basis knows that it’s very difficult to fold in new material if it means starting from scratch to develop lesson plans. Knowing that, we felt that in order for the book to have the best chance of being used, we had to lend a helping hand. It also gave us the chance to introduce artifacts, webpages, blogs, and films that teachers might otherwise not be aware of.
After assigning readings from the book to my students, we used one of the artifacts highlighted in Chapter 4, Victor Green’s The Green Book. Here was an artifact from the Jim Crow era that demonstrated African American ingenuity in action. Between 1936 and 1964, Green published his guide for “Negro Motorists.” Students using copies of the guide were tasked to take a trip in the Way-back Machine and plot a trip around the Mid-Atlantic states looking for places where they could lodge overnight, get a haircut, eat in a restaurant, use gas station restrooms. This hands-on experience left an indelible mark on them. Rather than just reading about the limitations imposed on African Americans, they were able to experience those limitations in an authentic way. They felt the frustration of not being able to locate restaurants or lodging.
Because the class is designed to help pre-service teachers understand a wide range of what it means to teach inclusively, this experience gave them a chance for authentic understandings about the history of their own students whose past includes these kinds of experiences. This heightened sensitivity was reflected in their written evaluations of what they would need to consider as they prepare lesson plans of their own.
During this class we welcomed Justin Murphy, a reporter from our local newspaper, The Democrat and Chronicle. His article helped spread the word about what we were doing and our special mission. We want kids to come out of social studies classes with a sense of their own legacy and empowered to make a difference.”

 

Getting ready for the new season

Out of my mind . . .

Image

This has been a really busy winter. Considering how much I hate driving in winter snow, the many chances to take our workshops and book talks around the western New York area made it a pleasure. Since I last up-dated this Mark and I have done radio interviews on The 1370 Connection and The Greg Rasheed Blogradio Show, Root n’ Roots. You can find a link to his show and our interview on our facebook page and while you’re there “friend” us. We’ve also done book talks at the Lift Bridge Book Shop in Brockport and at the Dansville, NY Public Library and are now preparing for a trip to the Baseball Heritage Museum in Cleveland.

One of the most important reasons we wrote our book was to reach the people who teach students preparing to become social studies and history teachers and people in the field who are already…

View original post 242 more words

Sacrifice Bunts

Middlebrooks’ bunt key part of Sox’s rally.

Image

 

Mark had just walked out the door after one of our regular Tuesday afternoon work sessions when I looked down at my notes and realized once more that I’d forgotten to mention something I’d meant to bring up. We had been noodling around with what to do with a bunch of little stories that didn’t quite fit the flow to the narrative, but were too good not to include.

I remembered a book by George Will called Bunts and I had suggested that title to Mark and he liked it, but it kept nagging at me that, for the material we had, it just wasn’t quite right. What they were, were more in the spirit of sacrifice bunts. I thought I could make a good case for changing the chapter head if only I could remember to mention it. The best description of a sacrifice bunt comes from W. P. Kinsella’s The Iowa Baseball Confederacy:

The bunt is a ballet production all its own. As the batter squares to drop the ball in front of the plate, watch the first and third basemen come huffing toward home, kicking up dust; watch the second baseman stealing toward first to take the throw while the shortstop covers second and the outfielders charge in to back up the bases in the event of an overthrow. It takes a lot of years watching baseball to learn not to follow the ball every second. When everyone is in motion, it is like watching those delicate long-legged insects skim over calm water.[1]

It is essentially the type of play that is all about the team. A well-placed sacrifice bunt can be the most important play of the game, in spite of its minor status overall. Home runs suck up all the glory, but the sacrifice bunt speaks to the heart of the game. It’s the little things, the plays without glory and often without notice, that are essential parts of moving the players along — winning the game.

 

This time, when I realized that once again, I’d forgotten to bring it up, I decided not to wait until the following Tuesday and hope I’d remember it then. No, this time I phoned. Even e-mail wasn’t speedy enough for me! As it turned out, as soon as I said, “I keep forgetting but I wanted to talk to you about the chapter title for the “bunts” section. It seems to me that what we have are a collection of . . . Here we said it in unison: sacrifice bunts! Apparently he’d been wanting to change the title of the chapter too!

 

We are very partial to that particular chapter, and in fact, in some ways the concept of the sacrifice bunt could be considered the central motif of both our book and the long civil rights movement itself. The following piece comes from the introduction to the chapter:

In each of these stories the “hero” essentially offers himself up for the good of the cause: the broader goal of expanding civil rights in America. Each in their own way, was moving the runners along. The useful concept of the sacrifice bunt can help students see the really important courage it took to be willing to make the small but critical sacrifices that ultimately overcame the institutional, customary, and statutory infrastructure of Jim Crow America.

Students, who can be impatient or downright hostile to the standard narrative of African American life found in even many of our best textbooks, need two things: first, they need to know that African Americans, often under the most difficult of situations, were always, always, actively striving for freedom and the civil rights that are the birthright of all Americans. And, second, they need to understand that action doesn’t always mean a home run. Actions like those we feature in Sacrifice Bunts were every bit as important to moving the cause forward, as the more notable, more celebrated actions. A sense of pride in the past, needs to comprehend the bravery of small rebellions. These, too, are an important part of the larger tapestry of American history.

 

 

 


 


[1] Kinsella, W. P., The Iowa Baseball Confederacy, (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986)

On Thanksgiving: A surprising discovery about Norman Rockwell’s America

Image

Because the Thanksgiving holiday has been on everyone’s minds, whether to complain about retail stores making their people work on the holiday or just to remind folks to be grateful for all they have and to share with others, I found myself looking at Norman Rockwell’s iconic Thanksgiving painting. You’ve all seen it — the HUGE turkey and the family gathered. He’s generally known for his mirroring of the American scene. I should say rather his homey and often humorous reflections on white bread America. But I knew that he had not limited himself to just that so I began looking for other ways Rockwell depicted America. The results were surprising and worth sharing.

Because of this blog, I at first thought of the painting called, “The Problem We All Live With,” of Ruby Bridges. The results of my search, although not exhaustive, opened up a window into Rockwell’s view of American life. As Jane Allen Petrick puts it, it was “Hidden in Plain Sight: The Other People in Norman Rockwell’s America.

Image

According to Petrick, Rockwell’s close association with the Saturday Evening Post required him in the Post’s directive, if African Americans were depicted at all, to show them in menial or subservient positions. This compelled Rockwell to affect a strategy of subversion if he wanted to continue painting their covers. As a result, for the duration of his time with the Post, African Americans’ presence in his art was limited but not absent and not demeaning. For example the painting below. In it the porter is shown, yes, he’s a porter, but he is clearly bemused by the kid traveling alone and trying to act like an adult.

Image

After leaving the Post, in part because of these restrictions, he began working for Life Magazine and the painting below shows that his vision of America was much more expansive than may have been previously thought. The times were changing and Rockwell intended that his art would reflect that.

Image

Another of Rockwell’s long associations as a commercial artist was with the Boy Scouts. Here he was able to be more expansive and took that opportunity. Paintings for Boy’s Life, the scouting magazine, and their yearly calendar were much more inclusive, as you can see from the two paintings below.

Image

Image

Much more can be found in Petrick’s book Hidden in Plain Sight:The Other People in Norman Rockwell’s America.

For now, I’ll leave this post with one last image that, I think, offers a clearer insight into Rockwell’s vision of America than we usually think of and one we may have previously missed.

Image

HAPPY THANKSGIVING AND HANUKKAH TO ALL

Blog at WordPress.com.