Time to update

The last entry crabbed about what I felt was an unfair review of our book. After rereading it, I can still feel the sting of that careless review. But, much has happened since so it’s time to move on. It’s been quite some time since I last posted here, but I’m really excited to be a Goodreads author. Both of our books have been finding homes with social studies teachers, so it’s time for a fresh start.

Over the past several years, Mark and I have traveled to Birmingham, Morgantown, WV, Harrisburg, PA and to schools in the Rochester area to present our on-going research and conduct workshops for teachers and teachers to be. We feel strongly that the work we’ve done and included in our book is an important addition to understanding the African American experience. It may sound obvious, but African American history IS American history. In order to understand our past, we have to strive to know, as Paul Harvey used to say, “the rest of the story.”

B4J_STU_CVR

We’ve also again turned our attention to helping teachers by adapting our book as a student edition. It follows the teacher edition but addresses students directly in the narratives. When I wrote the high school level American history text for the National Migrant Education Assoc.’s PASS (Portable Assisted Study Sequence) curriculum, the text needed to reach students with all levels of learning abilities, reading levels, and learning styles. We took that to heart in our student edition so that any student using it would find it accessible.

As we continue to find new ways to share the work, we’ll make sure to pass our progress along.

At the very least, read it.

I’ve rarely been as upset, annoyed, furious, or sad as I am today. Yes, I’m as mad as a wet hen. I just read a supposed “review” of our book. From the first sentence it was clear that the reviewer had completely missed the point of our work. First he called it a book about Jackie Robinson. It’s not. Then with a sneering undertone wondered, what could we possibly add to the already crowded field of works about him. So, from the get go it was obvious that he hadn’t even carefully read the title. Our book is about what came before Jackie Robinson, ergo the title: Before Jackie. From that point on, he quibbled about everything we worked so hard to include so that teachers could use our history in their classrooms. No, it’s not the last word on the time period between the end of the Civil War and the onset of the modern day civil rights movement. It wasn’t meant to be. Wet_Hen_Royalty_Free_Clipart_Picture_110104-174579-266053

Teachers themselves do not have the time to do or read exhaustive research, locate sources, and craft teaching strategies. That was our goal; to do and read exhaustively and then synthesize the literature into a usable volume. We wanted to offer enough background information to aid their interest in bringing African American history into their classrooms, compile oodles of resources, and offer teaching suggestions. There is little to no African American history woven into the majority of social studies textbooks, although there has  been  some improvement seen over the past decade. But, it is not enough. My experience with the teacher candidates with whom I work confirms that they themselves know very little about African American history and are, therefore, as new teachers, unprepared themselves to compensate for their textbook’s omission of this important part of our past. And, it’s important to note that teachers are eager for just such a volume. At presentations to teachers locally, at state-wide conferences, and at national conferences, our most frequently heard reaction to our work is, “This is just what I need!”

As James Oliver Horton ended his tenure as president of the Organization of American Historians, he used his farewell address, “Patriot Acts: Public History in Public Service,” to talk about the responsibility historians have to “provide a critical context” for our contemporary conversations that are grounded in a firm understanding of our national past. In today’s political climate, what could be more important than taking tangible steps to expand our collective understandings about the ways and extent of African American participation in the national story. Without it, African American kids feel left out of American history and wrongly assume there probably isn’t any or it would be taught. Conversely, the rest of our students draw the same conclusion, giving them the impression that everything of consequence that’s ever been done, has been done by people like them. They have a past. African American kids often acquire an undeserved sense of irrelevance or bravado while white kids acquire an undeserved sense of  entitlement and arrogance. Neither is good for the country.

The review then goes on to quibble about whether or not teachers would have the class time to use our teaching suggestions. In this, he also misses the boat. They are suggestions — meant to get teachers started with enough possibilities included for them to pick and choose what elements they want to use, which ones they will use later, what they may modify, and what they can add to. To complain about too many options is like going into a restaurant and complaining about too many entrees to choose from. And, just for the record, throughout, we encourage further exploration of the topics we highlight. We include a wide variety of “for further reading” suggestions as well as on-line materials to explore. As to the comment that it wasn’t clear to the reviewer what grade level we were targeting, had he read more carefully, we offer suggestions with each teaching strategy on how teachers can use it at a variety of grade levels.

Here’s a handy-dandy little set of guidelines for peer review that would have helped, had it been used.

Four-Peer-Review-Rules-2

The one saving grace is that it was published in an obscure journal teachers are unlikely to read, so we’ll focus on the very good reviews we received from professional education journals instead. It is my opinion that the reviewer did a lousy job of reviewing our book and my greatest hope is that should he ever write a book himself, that someone review his work as carelessly.

 

Teaching with Before Jackie

 mainartjackieametro

Mark working with students

It takes a certain amount of courage to use a book you’ve written with your own students. But, because one of the most important reasons Mark and I wrote this book was to reach pre-service social studies teachers, it would have been silly to neglect my own students. The results have been, so far, encouraging.
The layout of the book does two things: 1st it covers a broad range of African American history, from the end of the Civil War up to the modern Civil Rights Movement. This is a time period that James Loewen has called “the nadir” of race relations in this country. During this period the efforts to move a civil rights agenda forward were necessarily limited by the pervasive and often violent repression imposed on African Americans. All this means is that even small gestures and actions need to be appreciated for the enormous courage they required. For students, the evidence of this answers the question: why didn’t they fight back? The evidence shows that fighting back in overt ways was out of the question if you hoped to survive. So we looked closer to find the ways, within the system of Jim Crow, African Americans did struggle for every available inch of freedom. We characterize these struggles as “sacrifice bunts.” Not as impressive as a home run, but every bit as important.
The 2nd important element of the layout is the inclusion of lesson suggestions and resources that accompany each chapter. Anyone who is in the classroom on a daily basis knows that it’s very difficult to fold in new material if it means starting from scratch to develop lesson plans. Knowing that, we felt that in order for the book to have the best chance of being used, we had to lend a helping hand. It also gave us the chance to introduce artifacts, webpages, blogs, and films that teachers might otherwise not be aware of.
After assigning readings from the book to my students, we used one of the artifacts highlighted in Chapter 4, Victor Green’s The Green Book. Here was an artifact from the Jim Crow era that demonstrated African American ingenuity in action. Between 1936 and 1964, Green published his guide for “Negro Motorists.” Students using copies of the guide were tasked to take a trip in the Way-back Machine and plot a trip around the Mid-Atlantic states looking for places where they could lodge overnight, get a haircut, eat in a restaurant, use gas station restrooms. This hands-on experience left an indelible mark on them. Rather than just reading about the limitations imposed on African Americans, they were able to experience those limitations in an authentic way. They felt the frustration of not being able to locate restaurants or lodging.
Because the class is designed to help pre-service teachers understand a wide range of what it means to teach inclusively, this experience gave them a chance for authentic understandings about the history of their own students whose past includes these kinds of experiences. This heightened sensitivity was reflected in their written evaluations of what they would need to consider as they prepare lesson plans of their own.
During this class we welcomed Justin Murphy, a reporter from our local newspaper, The Democrat and Chronicle. His article helped spread the word about what we were doing and our special mission. We want kids to come out of social studies classes with a sense of their own legacy and empowered to make a difference.”

 

Sacrifice Bunts

Middlebrooks’ bunt key part of Sox’s rally.

Image

 

Mark had just walked out the door after one of our regular Tuesday afternoon work sessions when I looked down at my notes and realized once more that I’d forgotten to mention something I’d meant to bring up. We had been noodling around with what to do with a bunch of little stories that didn’t quite fit the flow to the narrative, but were too good not to include.

I remembered a book by George Will called Bunts and I had suggested that title to Mark and he liked it, but it kept nagging at me that, for the material we had, it just wasn’t quite right. What they were, were more in the spirit of sacrifice bunts. I thought I could make a good case for changing the chapter head if only I could remember to mention it. The best description of a sacrifice bunt comes from W. P. Kinsella’s The Iowa Baseball Confederacy:

The bunt is a ballet production all its own. As the batter squares to drop the ball in front of the plate, watch the first and third basemen come huffing toward home, kicking up dust; watch the second baseman stealing toward first to take the throw while the shortstop covers second and the outfielders charge in to back up the bases in the event of an overthrow. It takes a lot of years watching baseball to learn not to follow the ball every second. When everyone is in motion, it is like watching those delicate long-legged insects skim over calm water.[1]

It is essentially the type of play that is all about the team. A well-placed sacrifice bunt can be the most important play of the game, in spite of its minor status overall. Home runs suck up all the glory, but the sacrifice bunt speaks to the heart of the game. It’s the little things, the plays without glory and often without notice, that are essential parts of moving the players along — winning the game.

 

This time, when I realized that once again, I’d forgotten to bring it up, I decided not to wait until the following Tuesday and hope I’d remember it then. No, this time I phoned. Even e-mail wasn’t speedy enough for me! As it turned out, as soon as I said, “I keep forgetting but I wanted to talk to you about the chapter title for the “bunts” section. It seems to me that what we have are a collection of . . . Here we said it in unison: sacrifice bunts! Apparently he’d been wanting to change the title of the chapter too!

 

We are very partial to that particular chapter, and in fact, in some ways the concept of the sacrifice bunt could be considered the central motif of both our book and the long civil rights movement itself. The following piece comes from the introduction to the chapter:

In each of these stories the “hero” essentially offers himself up for the good of the cause: the broader goal of expanding civil rights in America. Each in their own way, was moving the runners along. The useful concept of the sacrifice bunt can help students see the really important courage it took to be willing to make the small but critical sacrifices that ultimately overcame the institutional, customary, and statutory infrastructure of Jim Crow America.

Students, who can be impatient or downright hostile to the standard narrative of African American life found in even many of our best textbooks, need two things: first, they need to know that African Americans, often under the most difficult of situations, were always, always, actively striving for freedom and the civil rights that are the birthright of all Americans. And, second, they need to understand that action doesn’t always mean a home run. Actions like those we feature in Sacrifice Bunts were every bit as important to moving the cause forward, as the more notable, more celebrated actions. A sense of pride in the past, needs to comprehend the bravery of small rebellions. These, too, are an important part of the larger tapestry of American history.

 

 

 


 


[1] Kinsella, W. P., The Iowa Baseball Confederacy, (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1986)

Local baseball history

Gem of local baseball history found

The article linked here, by Scott Pitoniak, was first published in the Rochester, NY Democrat and Chronicle, Sunday, February 26, 2006. I have no idea why I hung onto it — research into Negro League history was at that time at least two years into the future. It may have simply been just another example of my pack rat tendencies. More likely, since it was a piece of local history, another passion of mine, it had to be saved.

Like most people who teach, I am always looking at the world through “how can I use this to teach” eyes. I did, however, at the time have at least two grad students who were researching areas of sports history and the impact of sports in American society. That may have had something to do with it but no matter why it was saved, I’m glad it was.

The article is about Doug Brei of Fairport, NY and his discovery that one of the nationally known Negro Leagues teams had played for a season in Rochester. It highlights the 1948 baseball season when the Black New York Yankees made Rochester’s old Red Wings Stadium their home. It also features future Hall of Famer, Mule Suttles, and his time as the third-base coach for the team. As a result of Brei’s persistant advocacy, the Rochester connection is now listed in the Baseball Encyclopedia, is included in the files on the Black New York Yankees at the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, and Red Wings Stadium is now among the Green Cathedrals, the definitive book on Major League and Negro League ballparks. I think you’ll enjoy the article, I know I did.

I especially like that it underscored a point that we, Mark and I, made in our book, Before Jackie, that one of the more compelling reasons for using our alternate narrative is that Negro Leagues history isn’t just a national story, but rather local history everywhere in the country.

Image

Hall of Famer, Mule Suttles

It’s out!

Image

Before Jackie: The Negro Leagues, Civil Rights, and the American Dream is out and available through amazon, Paramount Press, and your local bookstore. Launching the work of over three years of effort is both an exhilarating and humbling experience. Along the way we have been buoyed by the support of friends and colleagues alike. Oddly enough, the hardest part wasn’t the research, that was a wonderful experience. Nor was the actual writing and revising. What seemed to elude us was reconciling a way to reach competing, and equally important audiences: social studies teachers and folks interested in history.

The most important audience we wanted to reach was social studies teachers. The alternate narrative that we present is designed to enrich the social studies curriculum by offering concrete examples of African-American achievement, courage, and ingenuity during, what James Loewen has called “the nadir” of race relations, the years after Reconstruction and before the full expression of the Civil Rights Movement. The standard textbook narratives of this time period is dominated by the most blatant outrages Jim Crow America visited upon African Americans. Less, almost never, is that narrative challenged by the equally important history of the many and diverse ways that African Americans forged a path forward on their own behalf. Unfortunately, the dominant narrative so completely overshadows the long civil rights movement that it’s understandable that it has been largely forgotten, misrepresented, and larded with misinformation.

This matters. It is no secret that African American students show little interest in social studies and sometimes outright hostility towards it. Whenever African Americans take the stage, the story gives them nothing to be proud of. On the other hand, it teaches other students that African Americans have offered nothing important to the story of American progress. In both cases, social studies short-changes all students.

Before anyone assumes that I’m advocating social studies as a form of social advocacy, let me be clear. What I’m saying is that the insidiousness of the “leavings out” is simply badly written history. In terms of the reasons why we teach social studies, it fails all of our students.

Because we felt so strongly that it wasn’t enough to limit our work to writing an alternate narrative, we decided to include teaching strategies and suggestions for each chapter. We wanted to do all we could to make it easy for social studies teachers to use the history we had written. This is where we ran into trouble. Rather than seeing what we were doing as a history with teaching materials added, publishers looked at it as a workbook! How frustrating! Because of that, we actually seriously considered taking all of the teaching materials out. Ultimately, we did not. In the end we decided that the most important reason for writing the book in the first place was to help teachers reach students.

People who are interested in history, won’t be disappointed. In fact, they will probably be surprised by much of what we’ve uncovered. As we researched the impact of the Negro Leagues, we were ourselves surprised and amazed by some of the side streets and back roads as well as super highways it took us on. We hope they feel it’s a worthy addition to the historiography. That would be gravy.

Our most important hope, however, is that we reach social studies teachers at all levels so that our work can enrich their work. If that happens, we will be more than happy. We will be ecstatic!

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.